Journal of FinTech and Sustainable Finance

Articles

Vol. 2 (2026)

Ethical Governance, National Culture and Financial Inclusion: The Mediating Role of AI/FinTech Adoption in Nigerian Commercial Banks

DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31875/2755-8398.2026.02.09
Submitted
July 1, 2026
Published
2026-07-01

Abstract

This study examines how ethical governance and cultural factors influence AI/FinTech adoption and financial inclusion in Nigerian commercial banks. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model and Task-Technology Fit perspective, the study argues that ethical and cultural conditions shape AI/FinTech adoption, which in turn contributes to financial inclusion. A structured questionnaire was administered to respondents with knowledge or experience of digital financial services in the Nigerian banking and FinTech context, yielding 86 usable responses. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics through reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, regression analysis, and Hayes’ PROCESS mediation analysis with 5,000 bootstrap samples. The results show that ethical and cultural factors significantly predict AI/FinTech adoption. AI/FinTech adoption also has a positive and significant effect on financial inclusion. Mediation analysis further shows that AI/FinTech adoption mediates the relationships between ethical factors and financial inclusion, and between cultural factors and financial inclusion. These findings suggest that ethical governance and cultural alignment do not improve financial inclusion only through direct channels; rather, their influence operates mainly by strengthening AI/FinTech adoption. The study contributes to digital finance and financial inclusion literature by identifying AI/FinTech adoption as a key mechanism linking ethical and cultural conditions to inclusive financial outcomes. The findings also suggest that banks, FinTech providers, and regulators should promote transparent, accountable, secure, and culturally responsive AI/FinTech systems to support sustainable financial inclusion.

References

  1. Arner, D. W., Buckley, R. P., Zetzsche, D. A., & Veidt, R. (2019). Sustainability, FinTech and financial inclusion. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y
  2. World Bank. (2022). Financial Inclusion. World Bank Group. https://www.worldbank.org/ext/en/topic/financial-sector/financial-inclusion Accessed 10/03/2026
  3. Bazarbash, M. (2019). Fintech in financial inclusion: machine learning applications in assessing credit risk. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498314428.001
  4. Biallas, M., & O’Neill, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence innovation in financial services. International Finance Corporation, 85(6), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1596/34305
  5. Cao, L., Yang, Q., & Yu, P. S. (2021). Data science and AI in FinTech: an overview. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 12(2), 81-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-021-00278-w
  6. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  7. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2021). Financial inclusion, digital payments, and resilience in the age of COVID-19. World Bank Report.
  8. Financial Stability Board. (2017). Artificial intelligence and machine learning in financial services. https://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financial-service/?utm_source
  9. Gomber, P., Kauffman, R. J., Parker, C., & Weber, B. W. (2018). On the Fintech Revolution: Interpreting the Forces of Innovation, Disruption, and Transformation in Financial Services. Journal of Management Information Systems, 35(1), 220-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2018.1440766
  10. Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 19(2), 213-236. https://doi.org/10.2307/249689
  11. Hamza, S. M., Aysan, A. F., & Kayani, U. N. (2025). Cultural Catalysts of FinTech: Baring Long-Term Orientation and Indulgent Cultures in OECD Countries. 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/econ-2025-0137
  12. Hayes, A. F. (2015). An Index and Test of Linear Moderated Mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2014.962683
  13. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage publications.
  14. House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.
  15. Idrees, M. A., & Ullah, S. (2024). Comparative analysis of FinTech adoption among Islamic and conventional banking users with moderating effect of education level: A UTAUT2 perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(3), 100343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100343
  16. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values*. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240006500103
  17. Jack, W., & Suri, T. (2011). Mobile money: The economics of M-PESA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w16721
  18. Khera, P., Ng, S., Ogawa, S., & Sahay, R. (2022). Digital financial inclusion in emerging and developing economies: A new index. https://doi.org/10.1111/aepr.12377
  19. Liaqat, I., Gao, Y., Rehman, F. U., Lakner, Z., & Oláh, J. (2022). National Culture and Financial Inclusion: Evidence from Belt and Road Economies. Sustainability, 14(6), 3405. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063405
  20. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Singer, M., White, O., & Berry, C. (2016). Digital finance for all: Powering inclusive growth in emerging economies. McKinsey Global Institute, 1.
  21. Mhlanga, D. (2020). Industry 4.0 in Finance: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Digital Financial Inclusion. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(3), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8030045
  22. Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003
  23. Rawat, R., Goyal, H. R., Sharma, S., & Kotiyal, B. (2025). SQRCD: Building Sustainable and Customer Centric DFIS for the Industry 5.0 Era. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2025.0160293
  24. Sahay, M. R., von Allmen, M. U. E., Lahreche, M. A., Khera, P., Ogawa, M. S., Bazarbash, M., & Beaton, M. K. (2020). The promise of fintech: Financial inclusion in the post COVID-19 era. International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513512242.087
  25. Steers, R. M., Meyer, A. D., & Sanchez-Runde, C. J. (2008). National culture and the adoption of new technologies. Journal of World Business, 43(3), 255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2008.03.007
  26. Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288-1292. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah5309
  27. Tarhini, A., Hone, K., Liu, X., & Tarhini, T. (2017). Examining the moderating effect of individual-level cultural values on users’ acceptance of E-learning in developing countries: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(3), 306-328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1122635
  28. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology1. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  29. Wang, S. (2025). Public Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in 20 Countries: Assessing Individual- and Country-Level Factors. Cross-Cultural Research, 59(5), 651-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971251336803
  30. Zetzsche, D. A. B., Ross P. Barberis, Janos N. Arner, Douglas W. (2017). Regulating a Revolution: From Regulatory Sandboxes to Smart Regulation. Fordham J. Corp. & Fin. L., 23, 31. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3018534