Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Articles

Vol. 1 (2025)

Leveraging Enterprise Architecture for Digital Transformation in Energy and Regulated Sectors: A Cross-Sector Perspective – The Czech Republic Case Study

Submitted
January 13, 2026
Published
2026-01-13

Abstract

This study investigates Enterprise Architecture (EA) as a strategic enabler of digital transformation (DT) and digital maturity (DM) within smart energy systems, focusing on Czech energy utilities operating under stringent regulatory frameworks. EA is conceptualized as a socio-technical coordination mechanism that aligns business and IT, integrates operational technology (OT) with digital platforms, and supports governance through standards and modelling languages such as TOGAF and ArchiMate. A mixed-method design was applied, combining a cross-sector survey with semi-structured interviews to capture adoption patterns, inhibitors, and tool practices across energy, finance, and public administration. Results reveal that energy utilities lead in EA maturity, particularly in ArchiMate-based TO-BE modeling, reflecting their role in grid modernization, renewable integration, and operational resilience within complex energy systems. Qualitative insights highlight a shared governance core, encompassing business-IT alignment, decision rights, and change management, while sector-specific differences emerge in areas such as interfaces, cultural readiness, and portfolio linkages. The results confirm EA’s dual role as a governance instrument and communication platform, enabling traceable decisions under regulatory constraints and fostering stakeholder engagement. Implications for practice include the need for configurable EA frameworks integrated with project and program management to accelerate smart grid initiatives and sustainability objectives across energy systems. Future research should investigate the causal relationships between EA maturity, stakeholder effectiveness, and DT success metrics in diverse regulatory environments.

References

  1. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2022 - Software, systems and enterprise — Architecture description, (n.d.). https://www.iso.org/standard/74393.html (accessed December 22, 2025).
  2. G. Vial, Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28 (2019) 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
  3. S. Kotusev, S. Kurnia, R. Dilnutt, Enterprise architecture artifacts as boundary objects: An empirical analysis, Inf Softw Technol 155 (2023) 107108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2022.107108
  4. TOGAF® Standard, 10th Edition Downloads | www.opengroup.org, (n.d.). https://www.opengroup.org/togaf-standard-10th-edition-downloads (accessed December 22, 2025).
  5. P. Malyzhenkov, M. Masi, F. Rossi, Elements of Sustainable Enterprise Architecture for the Energy Sector Business Modeling, Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies 431 (2025) 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-1210-9_3
  6. J.W. Ross, P. Weill, D.C. Robertson, Enterprise Architecture as Strategy: Creating a Foundation for Business Execution, (2006) 234. https://books.google.com/books/about/Enterprise_Architecture_as_Strategy.html?hl=cs&id=ng3AbVQlEncC (accessed December 22, 2025).
  7. ArchiMate Licensed Downloads www.opengroup.org, (n.d.). https://www.opengroup.org/archimate-licensed-downloads (accessed December 22, 2025).
  8. D. Hindarto, The Management of Projects is Improved Through Enterprise Architecture on Project Management Application Systems, International Journal Software Engineering and Computer Science (IJSECS) 3 (2023) 151-161. https://doi.org/10.35870/ijsecs.v3i2.1512
  9. E. Atencio, G. Bustos, M. Mancini, Enterprise Architecture Approach for Project Management and Project-Based Organizations: A Review, Sustainability 2022, Vol. 14, Page 9801 14 (2022) 9801. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169801
  10. Svyatoslav. Kotusev, The practice of enterprise architecture : a modern approach to business and it alignment, (2018).
  11. S. Kurnia, S. Kotusev, G. Shanks, … R.D.-… of the A. for, undefined 2021, Enterprise architecture practice under a magnifying glass: linking artifacts, activities, benefits, and blockers, Aisel.Aisnet.Org 49 (2021) pp-pp. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04936
  12. I. Parra, A. Rodríguez, G. Arroyo-Figueroa, Electric utility enterprise architecture to support the smart grid: Enterprise architecture for the smart grid, ICINCO 2014 - Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics 2 (2014) 673-679. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005014006730679
  13. R. Morakanyane, A. Grace, P. O’Reilly, Conceptualizing digital transformation in business organizations: A systematic review of literature, 30th Bled EConference: Digital Transformation - From Connecting Things to Transforming Our Lives, BLED 2017 (2017) 427-444. https://doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-043-1.30
  14. Teichert, Roman, Digital Transformation Maturity: A Systematic Review of Literature, Http://Acta.Mendelu.Cz/Doi/10.11118/Actaun201967061673.Html 67 (2019) 1673-1687. https://doi.org/10.11118/actaun201967061673
  15. S. Giraldo, D. la Rotta, C. Nieto-Londoño, R.E. Vásquez, A. Escudero-Atehortúa, Digital Transformation of Energy Companies: A Colombian Case Study, Energies 2021, Vol. 14, Page 2523 14 (2021) 2523. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14092523
  16. (PDF) Options for Formulating a Digital Transformation Strategy, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291349362_Options_for_Formulating_a_Digital_Transformation_Strategy (accessed December 22, 2025).
  17. O.Ye. Kaminskyi, Y.O. Yereshko, S.O. Kyrychenko, Digital transformation of University Education in Ukraine: Trajectories of development in the Conditions of new Technological and Economic Order, Information Technologies and Learning Tools 64 (2018) 128-137. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v64i2.2083
  18. I.V. Aslanova, A.I. Kulichkina, Digital Maturity: Definition and Model, (2020). https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200502.073
  19. R. Agarwal, G. (Gordon) Gao, C. DesRoches, A.K. Jha, R. Agarwal, G. (Gordon) Gao, C. DesRoches, A.K. Jha, Research Commentary ---The Digital Transformation of Healthcare: Current Status and the Road Ahead, Information Systems Research 21 (2010) 796-809. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1100.0327
  20. J. Khisro, Strategizing Digital Transformation: A Clinical Inquiry into a Swedish Public Sector Organization, AMCIS 2021 Proceedings (2021). https://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2021/org_transform/org_transform/7 (accessed December 22, 2025).
  21. C. Gellweiler, W. -Otto, Connecting Enterprise Architecture and Project Portfolio Management: A Review and a Model for IT Project Alignment, Https://Services.Igi-Global.Com/Resolvedoi/Resolve.Aspx?.
  22. B. Siuta-Tokarska, S. Kruk, P. Krzemiński, A. Thier, K. Żmija, Digitalisation of Enterprises in the Energy Sector: Drivers—Business Models—Prospective Directions of Changes, Energies 2022, Vol. 15, Page 8962 15 (2022) 8962. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15238962
  23. S. Kotusev, S. Kurnia, R. Dilnutt, • Rogier Van De Wetering, The Structuring of Enterprise Architecture Functions in Organizations, Business & Information Systems Engineering 66 (2024) 465-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-023-00845-4
  24. M. Lukáš, M. Ulman, M. Pavelka, P. Ambruz, J. Vaněk, Support of Project & Program Management of Digital Transformation Initiatives by Holistic Enterprise Architecture in Sectors of National Economy: A Case of the Czech Republic, Procedia Comput Sci 256 (2025) 1542-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2025.02.289
  25. Best Enterprise Architecture Tools Reviews 2025 | Gartner Peer Insights, (n.d.). https://www.gartner.com/reviews/market/enterprise-architecture-tools (accessed December 21, 2025).
  26. Steve. Else, Customer-Centric Architecture Method : pathway to high value enterprise architecture, (2019).
  27. V. Jiménez, P. Afonso, G. Fernandes, Using Agile Project Management in the Design and Implementation of Activity-Based Costing Systems, Sustainability 2020, Vol. 12, Page 10352 12 (2020) 10352. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122410352
  28. K. Benaija, L. Kjiri, Trade off between risk management, value creation and strategic alignment in project portfolio management, ICEIS 2014 - Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems 3 (2014) 447-452. https://doi.org/10.5220/0004952904470452
  29. D. El Hannach, R. Marghoubi, M. Dahchour, Project portfolio management Towards a new project prioritization process, 2016 International Conference on Information Technology for Organizations Development, IT4OD 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/IT4OD.2016.7479281
  30. V. Akberdina, A. Osmonova, Digital transformation of energy sector companies, E3S Web of Conferences 250 (2021) 06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125006001
  31. P. Maroufkhani, K.C. Desouza, R.K. Perrons, M. Iranmanesh, Digital transformation in the resource and energy sectors: A systematic review, Resources Policy 76 (2022) 102622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102622
  32. Z. Nazari, P. Musilek, Impact of Digital Transformation on the Energy Sector: A Review, Algorithms 2023, Vol. 16, Page 211 16 (2023) 211. https://doi.org/10.3390/a16040211
  33. D. Magaldi, M. Berler, Semi-structured Interviews, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences (2020) 4825-4830. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24612-3_857
  34. (PDF) Semi-structured Interview: A Methodological Reflection on the Development of a Qualitative Research Instrument in Educational Studies Ruslin, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358906376_Semi-structured_Interview_A_Methodological_Reflection_on_the_Development_of_a_Qualitative_Research_Instrument_in_Educational_Studies_Ruslin (accessed December 24, 2025).
  35. S. Kurnia, S. Kotusev, G. Shanks, R. Dilnutt, S. Milton, Stakeholder engagement in enterprise architecture practice: What inhibitors are there?, Inf Softw Technol 134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2021.106536
  36. G. Vial, Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda, The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 28 (2019) 118-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003
  37. The Open Group October 2022 Event: Digital Open Standards | www.opengroup.org, (n.d.). https://www.opengroup.org/Edinburgh-2022-10/proceedings (accessed December 22, 2025).
  38. X. Jiang, R. Dilnutt, S. Kurnia, Improving Business-IT Alignment Through Enterprise Architecture Stakeholder Engagement, (2024). https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2024/track01_peoplefirst/track01_peoplefirst/5/ (accessed December 21, 2025).
  39. C. Alphanso, S. Kurnia, R.D.-2022 2nd International, undefined 2022, Identifying Enablers and Barriers to Achieving Business-IT Alignment Through Enterprise Architecture Practice, Ieeexplore.Ieee.Org (n.d.). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9980850/ (accessed December 21, 2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/BDEE55929.2022.00021
  40. Uvítání a obsah webu [Architektura eGovernmentu ČR], (n.d.). https://archi.gov.cz/start (accessed December 23, 2025).