Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Material Science and Technology Research

Articles

Vol. 6 (2019)

Residual Normal and Shear Stresses on Different Machining-Finished Surfaces of Martensitic Ultrahigh Strength Steel

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2410-4701.2019.06.14
Submitted
October 31, 2019
Published
2019-10-31

Abstract

Machining induced residual stresses are known to have influenced mechanical properties of high strength metallic alloys. In this paper, we have compared the surface residual stresses of an ultrahigh strength martensitic/bainitic steel grade 56NiCrMoV7 induced by two different machining processes, namely turning and milling. Using the established d~sin2ψ method, x-ray diffraction technique was employed to measure the residual stresses on both the axial and hoop directions of cylindrical samples. The results reveal that, turning finish led to tensile residual stress in the axial direction and compressive residual stress in the hoop direction. On the other hand, milling finish led to compressive residual stresses in both the axial and hoop directions. In addition, large splitting in the d~sin2ψ linear regressions has been interpreted by the presence of residual shear stresses.

References

  1. Luo Q, Kitchen M, Patel V, Magowan S. Carbon partitioning and structure evolution in the hardening treatments of high strength steel, Proceedings of the 20th Congress of International Federation for Heat Treatment and Surface Engineering, Beijing China, October 23-25, 2012; 111-117.
  2. Luo Q, Kitchen M, Patel V, Filleul M, Owens D. Partialisothermally-treated low alloy ultrahigh strength steel with martensitic/bainitic microstructure, Proceedings HSLA Steels 2015, Microalloying 2015 & Offshore Engineering Steels 2015, The Chinese Society for Metals and Chinese Academy of Engineering, November 11-13, 2015, Hangzhou, China, TMS 2016; 433-438. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48767-0_50
  3. Luo Q, Kitchen M, Abubakri S. Effect of austempering time on the microstructure and carbon partitioning of ultrahigh strength steel 56NiCrMoV7, Metals 2017; 7: No. 258. https://doi.org/10.3390/met7070258
  4. Xin M, Xie L, Wang X, Run S, Yang H. Study on the surface residual stress of high hardness and strength alloy steel in high speed milling. Trans Beijing Institute of Technology 2010; 30: 19-23.
  5. Zhang H, Zhang X, Zhang H, Ren Y, Liu G. Surface quality of high-speed turning 300M ultrahigh strength steel. Surface Technology 2016; 45: 181-187.
  6. Liu J, Hou D. Study on residual stress in grinding-hardened layer of 40Cr steel. Heat Treatment of Metals 2008; 33: 127- 130.
  7. Madariaga A, Kortabarria A, Hormaetxe E, Garay A, Arrazola PJ. Influence of tool wear on residual stresses when turning Inconel 718. Procedia CIRO 2016; 45: 267-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.359
  8. Jang DY, Watkins TR, Kozaczek KJ, Hubard CR, Cavin OB. Surface residual stresses in machined austenitic stainless steel. Wear 1999; 194: 168-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1648(95)06838-4
  9. Arrazola PJ, Kortabarria A, Madariaga A, Esnaola JA, Fernandez E, Cappellini C, Ulutan D, Özel T. On the machining induced residual stresses in IN718 nickel-based alloy: experiments and prediction s with finite element simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 2014; 41: 87-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2013.11.009
  10. Ghosh S, Rana VPS, Kain V, Mittal V, Baveja SK. Role of residual stresses induced by industrial fabrication on stress corrosion cracking susceptibility of austenitic stainless steel. Materials and Design 2011; 32: 3823-3831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.03.012
  11. Zhang W, Fang K, Hu Y, Wang S, Wang X. Effect of machining-induced surface residual stress on initiation of stress corrosion cracking in 316 austenitic stainless steel. Corrosion Science 2016; 108: 173-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2016.03.008
  12. Ma Y, Feng P, Zhang J, Wu Z, Yu D. Prediction of surface residual stress after end milling based on cutting force and temperature. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 2016; 235: 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2016.04.002
  13. Withers PJ, Bhadeshia HKDH. Overview: Residual stress Part 1 - Measurement techniques. Materials Science Technology 2001; 17: 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1179/026708301101509980
  14. Cullity BD, Stock SR. Elements of x-ray diffraction, 3rd edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ : Prentice Hall, 2001; p. 435.
  15. Luo Q, Jones AH. High-precision determination of residual stress of polycrystalline coatings using optimised XRD-sin2ψ technique. Surface and Coatings Technology 2010; 205: 1403-1408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.108
  16. Luo Q, Yang S. Uncertainty of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) sin2ψtechnique in measuring residual stresses of physical vapor deposition (PVD) hard coatings. Coatings 2017; 7: No 128. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings7080128
  17. Moreno CM, Sanchez JM, Ardila LC, Aldareguia JMM. Determination of residual stresses in cathodic arc coatings by means of the parallel beam glancing X-ray diffraction technique. Thin Solid Films 2009; 518: 206-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2009.07.011
  18. Teixeira V, Andritschky M, Fischer W, Buchkremer HP, Stover D. Effects of deposition temperature and thermal cycling on residual stress state in zirconia-based thermal barrier coatngs. Surface and Coatings Technology 1999; 120-121: 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00341-2
  19. Liu H, Xu Q, Zhang X, Wang C, Tang B. Residual stress analysis of TiN film fabricated by plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition process Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 2013; 297: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2012.12.015
  20. Welzel U, Ligot J, Lamparter P, Vermeulen AC, Mittemeijer EJ. Stress analysis of polycrystalline thin filmsa and surface regions by X-ray diffraction. Journal of Applied Crystallography 2005; 38: 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889804029516