Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology

Articles

Vol. 12 (2025)

Mechanical Characterization of Natural and Synthetic Fibres using Sandwich Structures Under Bending

DOI
https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2025.12.05
Submitted
May 2, 2025
Published
2025-07-24

Abstract

Fibre-reinforced sandwich panels are a well stablished design solution for applications that require high stiffness and low weight, but the high cost and enviromental impact of synthetic fibres have prompted the research for sustainable alternatives, such as natural fibres. While they offer potential for cost reduction and environmental sustaintalibity, their mechanical properties may compromise structural reliability. In this context, this work compares the equivalent stiffness of different composite sandwich panels under bending, using carbon, glass, linen, jute and cotton fibres as reinforcement. The specimens were produced using the Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding (VARTM) and tested under four point bending conditions. Analytical methods were used for mechanical characterization, followed by Finite Element Method (FEM) validation. The results show that carbon fibre yields a greater stiffness-to-weight ratios followed by glass, jute, linen and cotton fibres. Sandwich panels with natural fibres reinforcement showed relative bending performances ranging from 19% to 35% of the carbon fibre ones.

References

  1. Zhang, A. Y., & Li, C. Y. Advances of Study on the Developments and Physical Properties of Composite Materials. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 633-634, 379-382, 2014. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.633-634.379
  2. Prisco, Umberto. Drilling of CFRP/Ti stacks in wet and cryogenic condition. Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology, v. 6, p. 31-39, 2019. https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2019.06.5
  3. Castanie, Bruno; Bouvet, Christophe; GINOT, Malo. Review of composite sandwich structure in aeronautic applications. Composites Part C: Open Access, v. 1, p. 100004, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100004
  4. Sadeghian, Pedram; HRISTOZOV, Dimo; WROBLEWSKI, Laura. Experimental and analytical behavior of sandwich composite beams: Comparison of natural and synthetic materials. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, v. 20, n. 3, p. 287-307, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1177/1099636216649891
  5. Blanchard, Jeanne; Sobey, Adam J.; Blake, James IR. Assessing the feasibility of natural composite for structural applications. European Conference on Composite Materials, 2016. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/436330/
  6. Hashemi-Karouei, Seyed Hasan et al. Analytical and finite element investigations of the cross-arranged trapezoidal-and sinusoidal-corrugated-cores panels. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, v. 29, n. 11, p. 1626-1636, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/15376494.2020.1834652
  7. Antonova, O. V. et al. Tetrahedral core sandwich panels behavior under bending loading. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing, 2024. p. 012001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2817/1/012001
  8. Thiagarajan, Suryaprakash; Munusamy, Raguraman. Experimental and numerical study of composite sandwich panels for lightweight structural design. International Journal of Crashworthiness, v. 27, n. 3, p. 747-758, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/13588265.2020.1838178
  9. Krzyżak, Aneta et al. Sandwich structured composites for aeronautics: methods of manufacturing affecting some mechanical properties. International Journal of Aerospace Engineering, v. 2016, n. 1, p. 7816912, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/7816912
  10. Beznea, Elena Felicia et al. Parametric study of experimental and numerical simulation of sandwich composite structures flexural behaviour. Mat. Plast, v. 54, p. 682-688, 2017. https://doi.org/10.37358/MP.17.4.4925
  11. Farajollahi, Amirhamzeh et al. Exploring bending behavior of curved sandwich panels with three-dimensional printed, functionally graded cores. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, v. 238, n. 11, p. 2189-2200, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207241241211
  12. Mallick, P.; Boorle, R. Sandwich panels with corrugated core-A lightweighting concept with improved stiffness. Aluminum Auto-Body Joining, v. 173, p. 79, 2015. https://doi.org/10.4271/2014-01-0808
  13. Kumar, M. Vijay; SORAGAON, Bhimasen. Fabrication and evaluation of multilayered polyurethane foam core sandwich panels for static flexural stiffness. Procedia Engineering, v. 97, p. 1227-1236, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.12.401
  14. Njim, Emad Kadum; AL-Waily, Muhannad; Bakhy, Sadeq H. A review of the recent research on the experimental tests of functionally graded sandwich panels. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Research and Developments, v. 44, n. 3, p. 420-441, 2021.
  15. Mohagheghian, Iman et al. Impact and mechanical evaluation of composite sandwich structures. Comprehensive composite materials II. Elsevier, 2018. p. 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803581-8.10055-4
  16. Deng, Y., et al. Theoretical and Experimental Studies on Vibration Resistance of Composite Plates with Damping Coating. Journal of Modern Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 2022, 9, 67-75. https://doi.org/10.31875/2409-9848.2022.09.8
  17. Bhaskar Reddy, K. et al. Experimental and Computational Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Glass Epoxy Composite Laminates at Different Fiber Orientations. International Conference on Modern Research in Aerospace Engineering. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. p. 135-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-1306-6_11
  18. Alfonso, Ismeli; RODRÍGUEZ-IGLESIAS, Vladimir; Figueroa, Ignacio Alejandro. Computational potentialities of the Finite Elements Method for the Modeling and Simulation of Composite Materials: A review. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), v. 20, p. 293-303, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-707620150002.0030
  19. Camanho, Pedro P. et al. Prediction of mechanical properties of composite materials by asymptotic expansion homogenisation. In: Mechanical Response of Composites. Springer Netherlands, 2008. p. 223-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8584-0_11
  20. Erturk, Alpay Tamer; ACIKGOZ, Cagatay. Performance comparison of analytical and numerical methods of elastic properties of composite micromechanics. In: Advances in Machinery, Materials Science and Engineering Application. IOS Press, 2022. p. 10-15. https://doi.org/10.3233/ATDE220412
  21. Golewski, Przemysław et al. Composite Medical Tabletops Made of CFRP with Different Cross-Sections: Numerical Analysis and Laboratory Testing. Materials, v. 16, n. 24, p. 7574, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16247574
  22. Qiu, J. (2022). Equivalent stiffness calculation of composite hat stiffened laminate. Vibroengineering Procedia, 47, 42-48. https://doi.org/10.21595/vp.2022.23045
  23. Perret, Olivier et al. Experimental determination of the equivalent-layer shear stiffness of CLT through four-point bending of sandwich beams. Construction and Building Materials, v. 186, p. 1132-1143, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.07.102
  24. Budynas, Richard Gordon et al. Shigley's mechanical engineering design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2011.
  25. Ramful, Raviduth. Assessing the Suitability of Three-Point and Four-Point Bending Simulation to Investigate the Fracture Mechanisms in Directionally-Reinforced Fibre Composites. In: 2022 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE). IEEE, 2022. p. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/CSDE56538.2022.10089287
  26. Beck, Rafael et al. Assessing critical fracture energy in mode I for bonded composite joints: A numerical–experimental approach with uncertainty analysis. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, p. 14644207241229601, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1177/14644207241229601